top of page
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • LinkedIn
Search

Hygiene Mix: The Number Independent Practices Rarely Calculate

  • carolteggart
  • Jun 9
  • 3 min read

If you had to guess what percentage of your practice's collections come from hygiene, would you know the number off the top of your head?




Plenty of owners can tell you their overhead percentage within a point or two. Far fewer can tell you their hygiene mix, even though it tends to move profitability just as much, sometimes more.


What hygiene mix actually measures

Hygiene mix is simply hygiene production as a percentage of total practice collections. Industry benchmarking from sources including the American Dental Association and dental hygiene productivity consultants puts the minimum healthy target at 25 percent, with high-performing practices producing 30 to 33 percent. When we look at practices that have not focused on this number deliberately, the figure is often closer to 22 to 26 percent, sitting at or below the minimum baseline rather than in the range that actually drives strong profitability.

That gap does not show up anywhere obvious. It will not appear as a flagged expense or a red number on your P&L. It shows up indirectly: lower total production per chair hour, a doctor's schedule that feels permanently overbooked because hygiene is not generating the exam and recall volume that should be feeding it, and a recall system that quietly lets patients drift to 8, 10, or 12 month intervals instead of the 6 months the schedule assumes.


Why the dollar impact is larger than it looks

Take a practice collecting 1.1 million dollars a year, sitting at a 24 percent hygiene mix. Moving that to 30 percent, in line with the high-performing benchmark, recovers approximately 66,000 dollars in annual production. That is not a hypothetical multiplier. It is the direct revenue difference between the two mix percentages, applied to the practice's actual collections base.

Compare that to overhead. A 6 point improvement in overhead, from 68 percent down to 62 percent, is worth about 66,000 dollars on the same practice. The two numbers land in the same range, which is exactly why hygiene mix deserves the same attention overhead usually gets, and in practice, gets far less.


The three numbers worth pulling this week

You do not need new software or a consultant to start. Three numbers, pulled from your existing practice management system, will tell you most of what you need to know:

Hygiene production as a percentage of total collections. This is the headline number. If you are below 28 percent, there is very likely recoverable production sitting in your schedule right now.

Recall reappointment rate. What percentage of hygiene patients actually rebook before they leave, versus being handed a postcard or a follow-up call weeks later? Practice management benchmarking groups, including AADOM and hygiene productivity consultants, set the target at 85 percent or higher. Practices that rebook at checkout consistently outperform practices that rely on outreach after the fact.

Average interval between hygiene visits. The schedule may assume 6 months. The actual average, once you pull the data, is frequently closer to 7.5 or 8 months. That gap compounds across an entire patient base.


Where the real fix usually lives

It is tempting to assume the answer is hiring another hygienist. In most cases, that is not where the gap originates. The more common causes are recall consistency, how hygiene appointment time is protected against same-day cancellations and reschedules, and whether hygiene scheduling is built around production goals or simply around filling open chair time.

A hygiene schedule that is full looks healthy at a glance. Whether it is actually performing requires looking at the mix percentage itself, not just the appointment book.


One thing to try this month

Timing matters more than it gets credit for. Practices that rebook the next hygiene visit while the patient is still in the chair, before they have stood up or moved toward checkout, see meaningfully higher reappointment rates than practices that wait until the front desk handles it at checkout or, worse, mail a reminder card weeks later. The difference is attention and momentum. A patient sitting in the chair is still in appointment mode and has nowhere else to be in that moment. A patient at the front desk is already thinking about payment, their next errand, and getting out the door.

This is a small operational shift, not a system overhaul, and it is worth testing on its own before assuming the fix requires anything bigger.


Where this fits into the bigger picture

Hygiene mix rarely moves in isolation. It is connected to recall systems, scheduling structure, and case acceptance further down the patient journey. Practices that work on it deliberately tend to see compounding improvement across all three, because a stronger hygiene department feeds a more consistent stream of diagnosed treatment to the rest of the schedule.

If you want to know where your own numbers stand relative to these benchmarks, that is a conversation worth having directly. Schedule a short call and we can walk through it together.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page